USPTO serial 87416863
VIX PULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIX PULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, VIC, 3181, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Card readers, namely, electronic card readers, chip card readers, smart card readers; microprocessor-based hardware systems used for controlling transit fares; microprocessor-based hardware systems used for processing transit fares; and computer software for defining, managing, ticketing and payments ecosystem for transport and mobility fare payments; computer software platform for facilitating and administering payments, banking, credit card payment processing, debit card payment processing, payment charge card processing, operating automatic teller machines, restoring stored value on debit cards, electronic funds transfers, processing electronic payments, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, cash disbursement, transaction authentication, payment routing, authorization of electronic payments, fraud detection and prevention in electronic payment transactions, encryption of online electronic payments; parts and accessories for use in relation to the foregoing, namely, transit fare payments, clearing houses, card and token management systems, Internet of Things device management and control systems, data warehousing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; design, development, updating and maintenance of online computer software systems used in relation to electronic payment for goods or services, including those for used to pay for goods or services in the fields of travel services, train, bus, ferry, tram fares, telephones; providing online information in the field of design and development of computer hardware and software via a global computer network or the internet; designing, creation and hosting of bill payment websites for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining computer applications of others in the fields of transportation and mobility payments; advisory and consultancy services in the fields of transportation and mobility payments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |