USPTO serial 87419562
ZWF0086
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZWF0086?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SUZHOU JIANGSU, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Ceramic knobs and glass knobs; Ceramic pulls; Clothes hooks, not of metal; Door fittings, not of metal; Door handles, not of metal; Drawer pulls of glass, porcelain or earthenware; Furniture; Furniture fittings, not of metal; Furniture parts; Glass pulls; Glass for use in framing art; Hand-held folding fans; Knobs, not of metal; Metal display stands; Non-metal clothes hooks; Non-metal door handles; Non-metal door trims; Non-metal pegs; Non-metal pulls; Nonmetal holders for signs; Novelty gift items, namely, empty cans; Ornaments of acrylic resins; Porcelain or earthenware doorknobs; Shelving; Works of art of nutshell | ACTIVE | Mar 19, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2018 | RRGD | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT DENIED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |