USPTO serial 87420059
LUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2019
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with LUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAHARA PRESENTATION SYSTEMS LTD
Erith, Kent, GB
Sahara Presentation Systems plc
Kent, GB
Sahara Presentation Systems plc
Kent, GB
Sahara Presentation Systems plc
Kent, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather E. Balmat
Heather E. Balmat BALMAT LAW, PLLC977 SEMINOLE TR., #342CHARLOTTESVILLE, MA 22901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and application software for use with screens that allows users to interact with interactive touchscreen displays and display and share audio and visual content on the screens; computer interfaces; computer interface software; interface software; graphical user interface software; digital audio/visual interface apparatus for interactive touchscreen displays; computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAHARA PRESENTATION SYSTEMS LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Sahara Presentation Systems plc
- Other trademarks owned by Sahara Presentation Systems plc
- Other trademarks owned by Sahara Presentation Systems plc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |