Drawing for SIMPLICITÉ

USPTO serial 87420864

SIMPLICITÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLICITÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yan Yang

Yan Yang Baker Donelson633 Chestnut Street Suite 1900Chattanooga, TN 37450UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC FOOD BLENDERS; ELECTRIC MIXERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC FOOD AND BEVERAGE BLENDERS; ELECTRIC PEPPER MILLS; ELECTRIC FOOD CHOPPERS; ELECTRIC MILK FROTHERS; ELECTRIC COFFEE GRINDERS; ELECTRIC FOOD GRINDERS; ELECTRIC COOKIE PRESSES, NOT BEING BATTERY-OPERATED; CITRUS PRESSES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC FRUIT PRESSESACTIVE—
008HAND OPERATED TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, HOUSEHOLD KNIVES; CUTLERY, FORKS AND SPOONS, CHEESE SPREADERS IN THE NATURE OF A SMALL KNIFE FOR CHEESE, NON-ELECTRIC FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PEELERS, KITCHEN SHEARSACTIVE—
011COMBINATION ELECTRIC TOASTER OVEN AND BROILER; ELECTRIC WOKS; ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS; ELECTRIC PANINI GRILLS; CONVECTION OVENS; ICE CREAM MAKERS; ELECTRIC RICE COOKERS; ELECTRIC FRYING PANS AND ROASTERS; ELECTRIC PIE AND PASTRY MAKERS; HOT PLATESACTIVE—
021HARD PLASTIC FOOD STORAGE CONTAINERS WITH VACUUM SEALED LIDS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; COOKWARE, NAMELY, POTS AND PANS WITH AND WITHOUT COVERS; NON-ELECTRIC GRILL PANS WITH AND WITHOUT COVERS; HAND-OPERATED PEPPERMILLS; HAND-OPERATED SALT AND PEPPERMILLS; MIXING BOWLS WITH COVERS; HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, GRATERS AND MELON BALLERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance