USPTO serial 87421216
AISVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AISVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shenzhen Hanglin Technology Co.,LTD
CHENG DIAN SOUTH ROAD NO 778YIWU, 322099CHINAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio speaker enclosures; Audio speakers; Audio speakers for automobiles; Audio speakers that may be attached with adhesive to the abdominal area of pregnant women for the purpose of transmitting music or sounds to the fetus, not for medical purposes; Batteries and battery chargers; Batteries and battery chargers for intravenous fluid delivery apparatus; Batteries for electronic cigarettes; Batteries for lighting; Batteries for pocketlamps; Batteries, electric; Battery cables; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for use with telephones; Cables, electric; Cases for contact lenses; Cases for electronic diaries; Cases for mobile phones; Cases for photographic apparatus; Cases for pocket calculators; Cases for telephones; Chargers for batteries; Chargers for electric batteries; Audio cables; Batteries and battery chargers; Batteries and battery chargers for intravenous fluid delivery apparatus; Battery cables; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for use with telephones; Car batteries; Cell phone battery chargers; Cell phone cases; Cell phone battery chargers; Chargers for batteries; Chargers for electric batteries; Coaxial cables; Computer cables; Connection cables; Contact lens cases; Data cables; Electric batteries; Electric cables; Electric shaver chargers; Electronic cables; Ethernet cables; Extension cables; Eye glass cases; Eyeglass cases; Galvanic batteries; Guitar cables; Jump start cables; Modem cables; Notebook computer carrying cases; Optical cables; Optical fiber cables; Power cables; Printer cables; Solar batteries; Solar-powered battery chargers; Solar-powered battery chargers; Stereo cables; Video cables; Wireless chargers | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |