Drawing for CAS

USPTO serial 87422771

CAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

BRENDAN P. MCFEELY KANE KESSLER, PC666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording of sound, images, and human vital statistics data; Integrated weapons carrier system for use in military and law enforcement applications comprising electronic sensors and detectors as an integrated component of duty gear belts and holsters which trigger sensor-activated body cameras to record audio and visual information when weapons or firearm are is drawn from belt or holster; System for use with video and audio recording devices comprised of cardio-sensors, respiration sensors, magnetic switches, low power radios, accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers and gravitometers, temperature, humidity, Si-O2 chemical sensors; Body cameras for use by military and law enforcement personnel; video and audio recording, transmission and storage devices, namely, low power wireless radios, internet communications, and wired serial communications to send data to remote computing, remote data storage and communications equipment; motion sensors; geo-positioning system, namely, a global positioning systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 1, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 1, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance