Drawing for SMARTHEALTH

USPTO serial 87422817

SMARTHEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTHEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna F. Schmitt

DONNA F. SCHMITT ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP7700 FORSYTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 1800ST. LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042software as a service (SAAS) services, featuring software for health care management, healthcare clinical analysis and management, patient identification, beneficiary management, population health management, quality management, cost accounting and financial analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
May 30, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 20, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 20, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 19, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 19, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance