USPTO serial 87423225
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P HARTMAN HARTMAN TITUS PLC3507 N. CENTRAL AVE.SUITE 101PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tire bead seating tools, tire mounting tools; Pneumatically operated tire bead seating and inflating machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |