USPTO serial 87423736
ASMORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASMORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONGGANG DIST.,SHENZHE, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Appliances for washing body cavities;Dental apparatus and instruments;Dental apparatus, electric;Teeth protectors for dental purposes;Hearing aids for the deaf;Gloves for massage;Abdominal pads;Soporific pillows for insomnia;Hearing protectors;Ear plugs;Teething rings;Babies' bottles;Breast pumps;Teats;Sex toys ;Abdominal belts;Hypogastric belts;Abdominal corsets;Strait jackets;Corsets for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |