Drawing for CLINTAR

USPTO serial 87423902

CLINTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLINTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Welch

JOHN L. WELCH WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037landscape construction services; irrigation maintenance services; snow plowing services; street and roadway cleaning and maintenance servicesACTIVE—
044landscape designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 3, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 6, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance