Drawing for TRIPLE CLEANED CORN

USPTO serial 87424601

TRIPLE CLEANED CORN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIPLE CLEANED CORN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEREMY A SMITH

JEREMY A SMITH LANIER FORD SHAVER & PAYNE PC2101 WEST CLINTON AVENUE, SUITE 102HUNTSVILLE, AL 35805UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Animal feed of cornACTIVEAug 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 22, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 11, 2019GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2019GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2019CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance