USPTO serial 87424825
BETTER U
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BETTER U?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing a website featuring a collection of online employment advancement options which offers consumers an online marketplace where users may access job placement services, employment counseling services and employment assessment services, which is designed for professional development and employee skills development | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring a collection of online education options which offers consumers an online marketplace where users may access tutoring services, education counseling services, education assessment services, educational courses and educational course materials, all in a wide variety of preschool, elementary, primary, secondary, college, graduate and post graduate disciplines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |