USPTO serial 87425217
CROPIQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2019
- Examiner
- JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with CROPIQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MULBERRY, FL
Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Plant City, FL
Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Plant City, FL
Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Plant City, FL
Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick A. Reid
Patrick A. Reid HILL WARD HENDERSON101 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARDSUITE 3700TAMPA, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Farm management software, namely, software plug-ins, add-ons, modules, extensions, and components for computer or mobile software applications configured for assisting agricultural professionals with the inspection, research, data collection and analysis, spectral sampling, and information on crop health and precision agriculture methods and technology | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGHLAND AG SOLUTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Highland Precision Agriculture, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CROPIQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 22, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |