USPTO serial 87428223
BEAUTYGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAUTYGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHENZHEN BEIJIALE E-COMMERCE CO., LTD.
Nanshan Dist, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN BEIJIALE E-COMMERCE CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Ho
Charles Ho Barron & Young Intellectual Property Ltd.P.O. Box 1484, General Post OfficeHong Kong,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Crimping irons; Curling tongs; Cuticle nippers; Cuticle tweezers; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Ear-piercing apparatus; Eyelash curlers; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Hair-removing tweezers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Manicure sets; Manicure sets, electric; Nail buffers, electric or non-electric; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Nail files, electric; Non-electric curling irons; Pedicure sets; Razor cases; Razors and razor blades; Razors, electric or non-electric; Shaving cases | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |