USPTO serial 87429408
CHRYSALIS ORCHESTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHRYSALIS ORCHESTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter E. Nussbaum
PETER E NUSSBAUM CHIESA SHAHINIAN & GIANTOMASI PCONE BOLAND DRIVEWEST ORANGE, NJ 07052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compact discs featuring music; Digital music downloadable from the Internet; Downloadable music files; Downloadable musical sound recordings; Musical recordings; Musical sound recordings; Musical video recordings; Visual and audio recordings featuring music and artistic performances; Downloadable musical sound recordings; Series of musical sound recordings; Visual recordings and audiovisual recordings featuring music and animation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |