Drawing for S2H

USPTO serial 87430442

S2H

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUKER, RACHEL EVE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S2H?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tobias Lederberg

TOBIAS LEDERBERG LEDERBERG BUSINESS LAW, INC.400 WESTMINSTER STREETSUITE 200PROVIDENCE, RI 02860

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; providing a website that features technology to enable secure exchange, collection and analysis of information by users; research in the field of healthcare and healthcare productsACTIVE—
044providing information in the fields of healthcare practices, products and outcomesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 24, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance