Drawing for FLYPAPER TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 87431429

FLYPAPER TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5587204Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2018
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with FLYPAPER TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela Alvarez Sujek

Angela Alvarez Sujek Miller Johnson45 Ottawa Ave SW, Suite 1100Grand Rapids, MI 49503United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, building information modeling (BIM) software for use in creation and coordination of computer models of buildings before they are built to make construction more precise and efficient; email archiving software; software tools for tracking revisions of, replacing and combining building drawings; and building drawing software and building information modeling software, namely, software which automates data entry and predicts, detects, and shows clashes between different building information models via algorithmACTIVEJun 15, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 18, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 13, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 11, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 11, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 16, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance