USPTO serial 87436850
ADVANTAGE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANTAGE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine E Charonko
Katherine E Charonko BAILEY & GLASSER, LLP209 CAPITOL STREETCHARLESTON, WV 25301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of computer networking hardware; Installation of security system; Installation, maintenance and repair of Ethernet and wireless networking hardware; Maintenance and repair of telecommunications networking hardware, apparatus, and instruments | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Computer technology consultancy; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Custom design and engineering of telephony systems, cable television systems and fiber optics; Data security consultancy; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; Franchising services, namely, planning and design of information technology systems for business franchises; Information technology consulting services; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Rental of space in a computer co-location facility for containerized data centers of others; Software design and development; Website design and development for others | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |