Drawing for EZ SCRATCH

USPTO serial 87437122

EZ SCRATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZ SCRATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea H. Evans, Esq.

Andrea H. Evans, Esq. THE LAW FIRM OF ANDREA HENCE EVANS, LLC14625 Baltimore Ave. #853Laurel, MD 20707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Hair brushes; Hair combs; Hair detangler brushes; Hair detangler combs; Caddies for holding hair accessories for household and domestic use; Large-toothed combs for the hair; Synthetic fibers for the manufacture of brushes, namely, toothbrushes, hair brushes and cleaning brushesACTIVE—
026Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair accessories, namely, hair extensions; Hair bands; Hair clips; Hair extensions; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair pins; Hair pins and grips; Hair scrunchies; Hair weaves; Cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair extensions and hair piecesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 16, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2017PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2017UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2017FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2017FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2017CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 23, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 31, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance