Drawing for TECHCLOUD

USPTO serial 87437590

TECHCLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHCLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk A. Damman

KIRK A DAMMAN LEWIS RICE LLC600 WASHINGTON AVENUESUITE 2500ST LOUIS, MO 63101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical Support services, namely, providing data center infrastructure management in the cloud for third-parties for monitoring, administration and management of voice, security, emergency call systems, clocks and temperature monitoring in cloud computing IT and application systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 13, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 8, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 5, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 27, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 26, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 26, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance