Drawing for LAZERCAT

USPTO serial 87439324

LAZERCAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAZERCAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen Rocco

Cathleen Rocco Hoban Law Group730 17th StreetSuite 420Denver, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Herbal tinctures for medicinal purposes containing hemp oil derived solely from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis and not containing CBDACTIVE—
030Chocolate, candies, and cakes all infused with hemp oil derived solely from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis and not containing CBDACTIVE—
034Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, containing whole plant extract from industrial hemp, or hemp oil used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form containing whole plant extract from industrial hemp, or hemp oil for electronic cigarettes; Mechanical electronic cigarettes containing whole plant extract from industrial hemp or hemp oil derived solely from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 23, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2019WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2019WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
May 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance