Drawing for HONDO

USPTO serial 87440872

HONDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSS, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HONDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Berghammer

JOSEPH J. BERGHAMMER BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.71 S Wacker DriveSuite 3600CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020reclining chairs; chair cushions; seat cushions; chair pads; furniture parts, namely, chair legs, arm rests, joints, feet, fabric holders, and chair fabric; fitted fabric furniture covers; seating accessories, namely, seat cushions, headrests, portable back support for use with chairs, neck-supporting pillows, inflatable headrests, footrests, non-metal castors, adjustable seat carriers, carrying strapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 11, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 9, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 28, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance