USPTO serial 87442907
ACP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2018
- Examiner
- BERLIN, JUSTIN E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ACP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
73432 Aalen, DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
73432 Aalen, DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
Aalen, DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Stone
Mark P. Stone LAW OFFICE OF MARK P. STONE27 Waters EdgeChappaqua, NY 10514United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Goods of metal for lifting, fastening and lashing, namely, lifting, fastening and lashing points, [ chains, chain links, chain pins, chain locks, chain deflectors, ] chain swivels, [ grippers, hooks, claws, ] eye bolts, shackles, [ carabiners, pegs and fittings; ] Devices and components of metal for the securing, coupling, shortening, guiding and tensioning of chains, belts and/or ropes; Shaped parts of metal, namely, metal castings, metal forgings and shaped metal fittings for lifting, fastening and lashing; [ Chain harnesses, namely, metal harnesses for handling loads; Metal clamping apparatus and spring buffers for lashing loads; ] all of the aforesaid goods optionally being provided with transponders and/or RFID devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Overload indicating devices and elements for chains, ropes and/or straps, namely, safety devices in the nature of load sensors for use in preventing overloading equipment that utilizes chains, ropes and straps; Load and overload indicator devices and ] elements for lifting, fastening and lashing means with integrated data transmission [ and data recording ] devices [ and/or sensors, in particular load sensors for use in preventing overloading of lifting, fastening, and lashing equipment ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ACP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |