Drawing for CLARIFEYE

USPTO serial 87446179

CLARIFEYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARIFEYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia J. Lee

Cynthia J. Lee THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP3200 Windy Hill Road, SESUITE 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, eye cups for use in irrigating the eyeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 16, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance