USPTO serial 87446800
BLINK CREDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLINK CREDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Beach, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure and nonsecure commercial transaction and payment services using payment devices at point of sale; providing credit card, smart card, NFC trans RFID/NFC equipped wristbands, data embedded image payment token, and debit card electronic payment authentication and verification services; providing electronic check, debit card, credit card, smart card, and electronic payment transaction processing services; mobile debit card, credit card, RFID/NFC equipped wristbands, data embedded image payment token, and electronic payment transaction processing services; wireless debit card, credit card, and electronic payment transaction processing services; payment processing solutions, namely, providing point-of-service electronic processing of debit and credit card transactions and electronic payments via electronic payment terminals; Computer software for use in electronic authorization, processing and management of card present and card not present credit card, debit card and electronic check transactions conducted via a global computer network; Redeeming the vouchers of others for payment of goods or services; Financial services in the field of retail and wholesale commerce, namely, financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options for retail and wholesale commerce applications; financial and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; services for authorizing and settling electronic payment transactions; electronic wallet (e-wallet) service, namely, stored-value account processing, namely, providing consumers with an e-wallet account for use in making secure electronic payments to merchants; electronic funds transfer; Financial services, namely, providing, processing, verifying, and authenticating mobile payments, and contactless credit and debit card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices; providing financial information by electronic means, namely, providing credit and debit card information; financial services, namely, processing and administration of mobile payments and contactless debit and credit card transactions, loyalty reward card transactions, and bill payment transactions with retailers, merchants, and vendors via mobile devices; payroll services; providing point of sale and payment processing for wholesale, events, festivals, venues, trade shows, conferences, restaurants, bars, and retail stores with hardware and software for use on portable devices, mobile devices, and handheld devices | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |