Drawing for SMARTCHARGE

USPTO serial 87447126

SMARTCHARGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTCHARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Ladenheim

MATTHEW J. LADENHEIM TREGO, HINES & LADENHEIM, PLLC9300 HARRIS CORNERS PARKWAYSUITE 210CHARLOTTE, NC 28269

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011(Based on Use in Commerce) LED light bulbs(Based on Intent to Use) Lamps; Lighting fixturesACTIVEAug 30, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 13, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2017CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance