USPTO serial 87447865
DENSITAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2020
- Examiner
- PASSMAN, NICOLE A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with DENSITAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Cadwell
Jeffrey R. Cadwell DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for medical diagnostic imaging for use in cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment; Computer software for medical diagnostic imaging, excluding imaging of biological samples; Computer software, for medical diagnostic imaging for use in health information systems for receiving, processing, transmitting, and displaying patient medical data, namely, diagnostic test results, diagnostic medical images, and patient personal data, and controlling and managing patient health information; Computer software for processing radiological images for medical diagnostic imaging; Computer software in the field of medical diagnostic imaging for managing quality control including training; Computer software, for medical diagnostic imaging using algorithms, to facilitate the comparison of metrics, medical and healthcare analytics and informatics, and data capture, and clinical decision tools | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2019 |
| 042 | Software research, development, engineering, design, installation, creation for medical diagnostic imaging; Software research, development, engineering, design, installation, creation in the fields of medicine, health, disease, pharmacology, oncology, and radiology for medical diagnostic imaging; Medical technology development and research in the field of medical diagnostic imaging; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for medical diagnostic imaging, namely, software to facilitate better image quality of medical diagnostic imagery, breast imaging, screening measurement of breast density, and breast cancer and heart disease risk assessment; Software as service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the fields of medicine, health and disease, namely, software to facilitate better image quality of medical diagnostic imagery, breast imaging, screening measurement of breast density, and breast cancer and heart disease risk assessment; Software design in the field of medical diagnostic imaging; Medical software design in the field of medical diagnostic imaging | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |