USPTO serial 87449256
Serial No. 87449256
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5903676Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 5, 2019
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 87449256?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
ANDREW D. SKALE MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROAD SUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing advanced calling features; electronic transmission of data, namely, music, sports scores and updates, jokes, and entertainment information via wireless devices, voice and text messaging; computer aided transmission of messages and images; teleconferencing services; telecommunication portal in the nature of telecommunication access services; providing information and expertise on telecommunications and services related to telecommunications services and devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2018 |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software platforms that offer an integrated mobile applications environment, provides an environment for integrating short messaging service, wireless application protocol and voice interactivity, and provides live audio streaming, interactive media programming, karaoke and mobile ecommerce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |