Drawing for ENROUTE

USPTO serial 87451548

ENROUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENROUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grady K. Bergen

GRADY K BERGEN GRIGGS BERGEN LLP3131 MCKINNEY AVE SUITE 600DALLAS, TX 75204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ophthalmic lensesACTIVEOct 15, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 20, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 26, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 17, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 29, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 19, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance