USPTO serial 87451745
WASABI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WASABI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire
HOWARD J. SHIRE ANDREWS KURTH KENYON, LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastries and confectionery; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice; sushi; flavourings for soups; noodles; Asian noodles; egg noodles; soba noodles; udon noodles; somen noodles; rice noodles; fried noodles; stir-fried noodles with vegetables; yakisoba noodles; dried and fresh pastas, noodles and dumplings; tempura batter mix; prepared meals consisting primarily of noodles or rice; fried chicken dumplings; curry sauces; chili sauce; dressings for salads; rice salads; sandwiches; baguettes; filled baguettes; sandwich wraps (bread); toasted sandwiches; cakes; yoghurt desserts; chilled desserts; chilled dessert pots; yoghurt pots; hot chocolate; coffee based beverages; tea based beverages; fruit flavoured tea; iced tea; cocoa based beverages; fruit breads; fruit cakes; fruit pastries; buns; bread buns; filled buns; rice-based snack food; cereal-based snack food; snack foods consisting principally of bread; snack foods consisting principally of confectionery; pancakes; dorayaki (Japanese style pancakes); Japanese-style pancakes (Okonomiyaki); snacks, namely, rice cakes; chocolate confectionery; biscuits | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2014 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; takeaway services; sushi takeaway services; provision of takeaway food; catering services; sushi bar and fish bar services; bar services; café services; services for providing food and drink; food and drink preparation services; salad bars; snack bar services; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |