Drawing for BSG EST. 2016

USPTO serial 87453842

BSG EST. 2016

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BSG EST. 2016?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Speiss, III

Thomas J. Speiss, III STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C.100 Wilshire Blvd.4th FloorSANTA MONICA, CA 90401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Razors; razor strops; razor cases; razor blades; electric razors and electric hair clippers; manicure or pedicure implements, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors; hair cutting scissors; blades and brushes for electric hair clippers and trimmersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 14, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 6, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance