USPTO serial 87454011
FROGCUSTOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLIOTT, LASHAWNDA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FROGCUSTOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saul Benjamin Abrams
Saul Benjamin Abrams Field LLP400 - 444 7 Avenue SWCalgary, AB, T2P0X8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Milling cutters; milling machines; milling machines used for carving; cutting machines used for carving foam; hotwire cutting machines; computerized hotwire cutting machines; lathes; powered turntables for use with milling machines and hotwire cutters; hotwire cutting machines; machine parts, namely, vacuum tables with work holding fixtures for forming plastic moulds; lifting machines for holding objects during painting or hard-coating processes; compressors for paint machines; Custom designed and manufactured milling cutters, milling machines, milling machines used for carving, cutting machines used for carving foam, hotwire cutting machines, computerized hotwire cutting machines, lathes, powered turntables for use with milling machines and hotwire cutters, hotwire cutting machines, machine parts, namely, vacuum tables with work holding fixtures for forming plastic moulds, lifting machines for holding objects during painting or hard-coating processes, compressors for paint machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Technical consulting services, namely, providing others with information regarding the design of custom-manufactured milling cutters, milling machines, milling machines used for carving, cutters used for carving foam and other materials, hotwire cutters, computerized hotwire cutters, lathes, turntables for use with milling machines and hotwire cutters, hotwire cutting tools, scanning tables for scanning the shape of objects, vacuum tables for forming plastic moulds, lifts for holding objects during painting or hard-coating processes, paint compressors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Streamline Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Streamline Automation Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FROGCUSTOM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |