USPTO serial 87455486
ANSELMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANSELMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SARONNO (Varese), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | White of eggs; albumen for culinary purposes; milk beverages, milk predominating; fruit peel; cocoa butter for food; cranberry sauce; jams; tinned fruits; milk shakes; fruit chips; frozen fruits; fruit, preserved; fruit, stewed; candied fruit; crystallized fruits; berries, preserved; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; fruit jellies; edible fats; coconut fat; almonds, ground; marmalade; hazelnuts, prepared; prepared nuts; cream; fruit pulp; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit-based snack food; yolk of eggs; yogurt | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2002 |
| 030 | Flavorings for beverages, other than essential oils; vanilla flavorings for culinary purposes; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; tea-based beverages; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; puddings; waffles; chocolate; confectionery made of sugar; pancakes; candy decorations for cakes; chocolate decorations for cakes; ice cream; edible ices; fruit jelly candy; cake frosting; cocoa-based ingredients in confectionery products; thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; starch-based binding agents for ice cream; candy mints; honey; dessert mousse; almond paste; pastry dough; cake dough; pasta; pastries; baking powder; ice cream powder; cocoa; starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; sauces; sherbets; frozen yogurt; sugar; semi-processed ice cream | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |