USPTO serial 87455637
KEKETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEKETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAVAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S Gareau
2780, MISTASSINILAVAL, QUEBEC, H7E3W1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | (Based on 44(d))(Based on Intent to Use) Beer; Flavored beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |