USPTO serial 87456817
HMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; Distribution; Marketing; Wholesale Services; Business Management; Business Administration; Office Functions; Systematization of information into Computer Databases; Retail Department Store Services; Wholesale and Retail Store Services; Online retail store services featuring a wide variety of Electronic goods of others; Providing a website for connecting sellers with buyers; Operating online marketplaces for sellers and buyers of goods and/or services; Service related to Advertising, Distribution, Marketing, Wholesale and Retail of Electronic goods, namely, Computers, Printers, Computer accessories, Printer accessories, Mobile Phone, Tablet, Mobile phone accessories, Telephone, Tablet accessories, Telephone accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2019 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |