Drawing for BL360

USPTO serial 87457266

BL360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSEN, BENJAMIN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BL360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Minh N. Nguyen

MINH N. NGUYEN NEXT IP LAW GROUP LLC303 PERIMETER CENTER NORTHSUITE 300ATLANTA, GA 30346

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Beauty salons for eyebrows and eyelashesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 28, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 27, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 15, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 14, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 14, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 29, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 28, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance