USPTO serial 87461251
SEA CHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEA CHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Beverly
BRIAN BEVERLY BEESON SKINNER BEVERLY LLPONE KAISER PLAZA, SUITE 750OAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, shellfish, crustaceans, poultry and game; Meat extracts; Preserved, dried, cooked, refrigerated or frozen meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry and game; preserved, dried, cooked, chilled and frozen fruits and vegetables; Tinned fruits, tinned vegetables, tinned meat, tinned fish, shellfish and seafood, tinned poultry and game; Tinned foodstuffs consisting entirely or predominantly of meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game, potatoes, vegetables, fruits; Preserved or refrigerated salads consisting entirely or predominantly of vegetables, potatoes, meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game, cheese; Preserved, dried, refrigerated or frozen prepared dishes consisting entirely or predominantly of meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game, potatoes, fruits, vegetables, cheese; Dehydrated food preparations and snack foods consisting entirely or predominantly of meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game, potatoes, fruits, vegetables, cheese; Spreads based entirely or predominantly on meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game, vegetables, cheese; Jellies, jams, compotes; Eggs; Milk, cream, butter, cheese and dairy products; Edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; Flour, corn flour and preparations made from cereals; Bread, pastry and confectionery; Farinaceous food pastes; Preserved, dried, cooked, refrigerated, frozen or tinned food preparations, prepared dishes and prepared salads consisting predominantly of rice, pasta or semolina, alone or with added vegetables, cheese, meat, fish, shellfish, seafood, poultry, game; Salt, mustard; Vinegar, sauces (condiments); Mayonnaise; Tomato ketchup; Cooking sauces; Marinades; Meat gravies, Instant preparations for making bases, Preparations for preparing sauces; Dressings for salad; Seasonings and spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, training in the field of sustainable development and resource management in food production. Operation of websites for the dissemination of information and education and training materials in the field of sustainable development and resource management in food production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SEA CHANGE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |