Drawing for BEAM STREAM

USPTO serial 87461323

BEAM STREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAM STREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY F. GERSH

JEFFREY F. GERSH STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, 20TH FLOORSHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled readers; Blank near field communication (NFC) tags; software for use with NFC technology-enabled devices, namely, software for tracking NFC technology-enabled devices, namely, wearable technology; operating system software for running accessories used with NFC technology-enabled devices, namely, wearable technology; downloadable software for creating, browsing, and purchasing expressive content for display on NFC technology-enabled devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance