Drawing for RIGGS

USPTO serial 87464573

RIGGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIGGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher R. Chase

CHRISTOPHER R CHASE FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENUE9TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022-5754

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel services; restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 19, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 19, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 19, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 31, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 4, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 4, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance