Drawing for SUNBRITE

USPTO serial 87464637

SUNBRITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNBRITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua G. Gigger

Joshua G. Gigger STOEL RIVES LLP201 South Main Street, Suite 1100Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Outdoor electronic audio, video and network equipment, namely, audio receivers, racks for audio and video equipment; stands adapted for stereo and audio speakers; video recorders, home theater systems comprised of television, audio speakers, DVD player, video disc players, amplifier, audio and video receivers; residential structured wiring systems, namely, electric wires and cables; audio and video cable connectors; satellite dish antenna, headsets for audio speakers, televisions and telephones; video, audio, Internet and network servers; electric, network, power and high definition multimedia interface switches, modems, operator consoles for operating television sets, audio speakers, DVD player, video disc players, amplifiers, audio speakers and audio and video receivers, network interface cards, telephone call and ethernet routers, computer network bridges and bridge services, signal generators being digital signal processors; ethernet switches and ethernet PC adapter and network management cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2018IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2018INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 30, 2018INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Aug 30, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 30, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 7, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance