USPTO serial 87465571
REPEL-TEK ANTI-CORROSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REPEL-TEK ANTI-CORROSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK KUSNER
MARK KUSNER KUSNER & JAFFE6150 PARKLAND BOULEVARD, STE. 105PARAGON CENTER IIMAYFIELD HEIGHTS, OH 44124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive wheel hub assemblies having anti-corrosion coating on internal threads and mating wheel bolts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |