Drawing for SMARTKEY SECURITY

USPTO serial 87467617

SMARTKEY SECURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTKEY SECURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Zimmermann

ANNE E NAFFZIGER LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N STETSON AVE SUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6745UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic locks; electronic lock cylinders; wireless electronic locking systems primarily consisting of wireless electronic locks, wireless gateways, wireless plug-in modules and key fobs, sold as a unit; Electronic plug-in modules capable of enabling wireless control of locks; Wireless electronic locking systems consisting of wireless electronic locks and communication systems, namely, computer hardware and software for enabling users program, control, operate, monitor and manage electronic locks via a global computer network, wireless telephone network, or by radio transmission; Wireless computer gateways for transmitting and receiving signals for electronic locks; Encoded electronic wireless key fobs for controlling electronic locks; Computer application software for computers, mobile phones and mobile computing devices, namely, software for programming, controlling, operating, monitoring and managing electronic locks, access control devices, encrypted electronic keys and home automation devices; Computer application interface software for computers, mobile phones and mobile computing devices for programming, monitoring, controlling, operating and managing electronic locks, access control devices, encrypted electronic keys and home automation devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 31, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 21, 2020RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 8, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 31, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2020INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 22, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 4, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 3, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance