USPTO serial 87467617
SMARTKEY SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTKEY SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Zimmermann
ANNE E NAFFZIGER LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N STETSON AVE SUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6745UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic locks; electronic lock cylinders; wireless electronic locking systems primarily consisting of wireless electronic locks, wireless gateways, wireless plug-in modules and key fobs, sold as a unit; Electronic plug-in modules capable of enabling wireless control of locks; Wireless electronic locking systems consisting of wireless electronic locks and communication systems, namely, computer hardware and software for enabling users program, control, operate, monitor and manage electronic locks via a global computer network, wireless telephone network, or by radio transmission; Wireless computer gateways for transmitting and receiving signals for electronic locks; Encoded electronic wireless key fobs for controlling electronic locks; Computer application software for computers, mobile phones and mobile computing devices, namely, software for programming, controlling, operating, monitoring and managing electronic locks, access control devices, encrypted electronic keys and home automation devices; Computer application interface software for computers, mobile phones and mobile computing devices for programming, monitoring, controlling, operating and managing electronic locks, access control devices, encrypted electronic keys and home automation devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |