USPTO serial 87469134
BEASEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEASEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guang Zhou, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bakeware; Kitchen containers; Kitchen utensil crocks; Kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; Basting spoons; Basting spoons; Boot stretchers of wood; Bottle gourds; Bottle squeegees; Bottle stands; Bottles, sold empty; Bread boards; Cake servers; Cake stands; Cake supports, namely, cake bases; Candle jars; Car washing mitts; Carving boards; Chocolate molds; Cleaning cloths; Cleaning combs; Clothes drying racks; Coffee mugs; Coffee stirrers; Containers for household use, namely, globes; Cookie cutters; Cooking spoons; Cooking utensils, namely, grills; Cork holders; Corn cob holders; Crushers for kitchen use, non-electric; Cup cake molds; Cups; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Decorative plates; Dish covers; Dish stands; Dishers; Disposable paperboard bakeware; Dog food scoops; Feather dusters; Foot exfoliating pads; Fruit muddlers; Graters for kitchen use; Hand-operated cherry pitters; Hot air hair brushes; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Ice cream scoops; Ice scoops; Kitchen utensils, namely, pouring and straining spouts; Lint rollers; Mortars for kitchen use; Non-electric crushers for kitchen use; Non-electric ice crushers; Non-electric mincers; Non-electric warmers for use with tea candles to melt scented wax tarts; Pestles for kitchen use; Pet litter box liners; Pet waste management kits comprising scoops for pet waste disposal, plastic bags and liners, and portable dispensers for plastic bags and liners sold as a unit; Portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods; Rotary cheese graters; Rotating holders for kitchen utensils; Scoops for the disposal of pet waste; Servingware for serving food and drinks; Soap boxes; Soap brackets; Soap containers; Soap holders; Soup tureens; Spoon rests; Sugar tongs; Tankards not of precious metal; Tea pots not of precious metal; Toothbrush head covers; Toothpick holders; Wooden cooking spoons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |