USPTO serial 87472051
MRK HOTEL COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2021
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MRK HOTEL COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N. Miami Beach, FL, US
N. Miami Beach, FL, US
N. Miami Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
George W. Lewis WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP1250 CONNETICUT AVE., NWSUITE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel, restaurant, and catering services; corporate events, namely, rental of social function facilities for social corporate events | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |