Drawing for BERRY

USPTO serial 87474434

BERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan G. Morton

JONATHAN G. MORTON Morton & Associates LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Lace; Embroidery; buttons; hooks and eyes; needles; artificial flowersACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunication access services, digital network telecommunications services, transmission of webcasts and podcasts, providing electronic message alerts via the internet, personal communication services and, providing multiple-user access to a global computer network, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of voices, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic transmission of images, photographs, graphic images and illustrations over a global computer network; transmission of data, audio, video and multimedia files by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; television programme broadcasting; simulcasting broadcast television over global communication networks, the Internet and wireless networks; provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via an online video-on-demand service; satellite communication services; telecommunications gateway servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 3, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 31, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 11, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance