Drawing for BARE NATURE 10

USPTO serial 87480584

BARE NATURE 10

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARE NATURE 10?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joyce B. Klemmer

JOYCE B. KLEMMER SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLPPROMENADE STE 31001230 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Protein supplement shakes; Dietary supplement drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beveragesACTIVE—
032Lemonade; flavored waters; fruit drinks; fruit juices; sports drinks, namely, performance drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Sports drinks enriched with vitamins; carbonated non-alcoholic drinks and carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance