Drawing for CORVEX CONNECTED SAFETY

USPTO serial 87480740

CORVEX CONNECTED SAFETY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORVEX CONNECTED SAFETY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel A. Rosenberg

DANIEL A. ROSENBERG BRIGGS & MORGAN2200 IDS CENTER, 80 S. 8TH ST.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Workplace safety compliance system comprising sensors, safety equipment comprising primarily protective helmets, protective eye pieces, protective eyewear, face-protection shields, protective ear-covering shields, safety goggles, respiratory masks for non-medical purposes, dust masks, protection masks, oxygen masks not for medical use, protective work gloves, clothing and insulated clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation, fire, and chemicals, protective industrial shoes, boots, and footwear, fall protection equipment for fall restraint and fall arrest in the nature of bars, anchors, harnesses, lines, lanyards, carabiners and anchorage connectors, and also including ear plugs for noise reduction, that have been modified for communication with computer equipment spatial tracking devices, computers for receiving and interpreting information to determine compliance with safety requirements; Downloadable software for use with the foregoing safety compliance systems, for monitoring use of safety equipment, and for remote monitoring of safety complianceACTIVE—
042providing software as a service featuring software for monitoring compliance with workplace safety rules for use with a system of sensors for spatial tracking and monitoring safety equipment positioningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance