USPTO serial 87481327
LUSCIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUSCIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren M. Geliebter
Darren M. Geliebter Lombard & Geliebter LLP305 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics including lipstick; lip gloss; lip liners; hydrating lip primer; powder blush; foundation; mascara; eyebrow pencils; make up kits comprised of non-medicated cosmetics, lipstick, lip gloss; cruelty-free, and vegan cosmetic products; compacts containing make-up for makeup kits | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 008 | Eyelash curlers; cosmetic hand tools, namely, tweezers | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2017 |
| 018 | Travel bags; cosmetics bags and cases sold empty | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 020 | Personal compact mirrors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 021 | Make-up brushes; make-up removing appliances; makeup application appliances, namely, applicator sticks for applying makeup; compacts sold empty for makeup kits | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technologies Pvt Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named LUSCIOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |