Drawing for OPUS WEALTH MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 87484991

OPUS WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPUS WEALTH MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tiffany D.W. Shimada

Tiffany D.W. Shimada Dorsey & Whitney LLP111 S. Main Street, Suite 2100IP DepartmentSalt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Securities brokerage services; Brokerage services in the field of securities and commodities investing; Financial investment in the field of securities and precious metals; Insurance brokerage services; Investment brokerage services; Financial planning and investment advisory services; Information, advisory, consultancy, and research services relating to finance and investments; all of the aforementioned services being provided to individual retail investors and such services not directly provided to companies in the field of private equity and venture capitalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 7, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 19, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 20, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 20, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance