Drawing for GENESIS SLANT

USPTO serial 87485011

GENESIS SLANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENESIS SLANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028amusement machines, automatic and coin-operated; amusement apparatus for use in arcades, namely, amusement apparatus incorporating a television monitor or screen, amusement apparatus incorporating a video monitor, amusement apparatus adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, amusement game machines; electronic arcade games; game machines, namely, amusement game machines, arcade game machines, home video game machines, LCD game machines, stand-alone video game machines, video game machinesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2019MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2019ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 31, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 31, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 31, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 11, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 6, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 15, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 1, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 23, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 12, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance